Aggregate
acreage in Argentina like in the U.S.: Stable and always in use
The
recent pressure on soybean prices results from a combination of
good weather in the Midwest crop growing areas and increased production
levels in Argentina and Brazil. In Brazil much of the increase in
production comes as the result of opening up new land that previously
had not been used for soybean production. The increase in tillable
acres in Brazil will continue to increase for the foreseeable future,
much as tillable acres in the United States increased as settlers
moved across what is now the corn belt.
While the situation in Brazil is much like it was in the United
States in the 1800s, the situation in Argentina is similar to the
U.S. today. Nearly all of the potential agricultural acreage has
been identified and is currently under production. There are only
small areas where the land is being deforested and opened up to
agricultural production.
For the crop year that just ended, the area of soybean production
increased by 9.4% over the previous year. With little new area available,
the area used for the production of other crops declined, while
total area devoted to agricultural production remained stable.
The acreage devoted to a given crop can rise and fall depending
on the relative profitability of a crop compared to its alternate.
Farmers have always been good at switching from one crop to another
as circumstances change. Over the short to medium range what stays
constant is the aggregate acreage.
Farmers may change their crop mix, but they don’t leave significant
areas unplanted unless forced to do so by weather. As we think about
agricultural policies, the thing we have to keep in mind is that
it is aggregate acreage that counts.
Daryll E. Ray holds the Blasingame
Chair of Excellence in Agricultural Policy, Institute of Agriculture,
University of Tennessee, and is the Director of UT’s Agricultural
Policy Analysis Center. (865) 974-7407; Fax: (865) 974-7298; dray@utk.edu;
http://www.agpolicy.org.
Reproduction Permission Granted
with:
1) Full attribution to Daryll E. Ray and the Agricultural Policy
Analysis Center, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN;
2) An email sent to hdschaffer@utk.edu
indicating how often you intend on running Dr. Ray’s column
and your total circulation. Also, please send one copy of the first
issue with Dr. Ray’s column in it to Harwood Schaffer, Agricultural
Policy Analysis Center, 310 Morgan Hall, Knoxville, TN 37996-4519.
|