Have
we reached a new permanent plateau in crop prices?
Over the last year as corn prices, followed by those of soybeans
and wheat, have risen to levels only dreamed of a couple of years
ago, we have increasingly heard discussion about farm commodity
prices reaching a new plateau. A recent article in the “Kansas
City Star” by “Wall Street Journal” reporter Scott
Kilman captures this perspective with the title, “The days
of cheap grain are gone, according to agriculture experts”
(http://www.kansascity.com/business/story/295686.html).
In that article Kilman quotes Dan Basse, president of AgResource
Co., a Chicago commodity forecasting concern, as saying, “The
days of cheap grain are gone.” Kilman goes on to write, “In
the past…increases have been caused by temporary supply disruptions.
After a poor harvest, farmers would rush to capitalize on higher
crop prices by planting more of that crop the next season, sending
prices back down. But the current rally, which started a year ago
in the corn-futures trading pit at the Chicago Board of Trade, is
different.”
Kilman offers three pieces of evidence in support of the “new
plateau” thesis. The first piece of evidence is the spread
of the price increase beyond corn to other commodities and the fact
that it has lasted for more than a year. The second piece of evidence
is no surprise to anyone: the increased demand for corn as the primary
input for ethanol production supported by government incentives.
The growing middle class in Asia and Latin America constitutes the
third piece of evidence. The expectation is that a growing middle
class in these areas will shift from a grain based diet to one that
includes more milk and meat which will result in the need for increasing
amounts of grains and seeds as feed ingredients. It is implicitly
expected that the US will benefit from this rapid rise in demand
for bulk commodities like corn and soybeans.
In these arguments, Kilman’s article matches the arguments
we have heard from many quarters including farmers, members of farm
commodity groups, legislative aides, and farm reporters.
Kilman notes one of the reasons why many want to believe in a “new
plateau” when he writes, “The prospect of a long boom
is riveting economists because the declining real price of grain
has long been one of the unsung forces behind the development of
the global economy. Thanks to steadily improving seeds, synthetic
fertilizer and more powerful farm equipment, the productivity of
farmers in the West and Asia has stayed so far ahead of population
growth that corn prices dropped 75 percent and wheat 69 percent,
adjusted for inflation, since 1974.”
The last shift in commodity prices took place in the 1972 and 1973
crop years. To better help us evaluate what is happening today,
let us look what happened in that plateau shift.
The 1970s plateau shift began with the boom in export demand brought
on by a decision by USSR leaders to import large amounts of grain
in response to a crop failure. At that time, the price of corn doubled,
moving from the $1.00+ level to the $2.00+ level.
While the boom in exports was triggered by the Soviets, it was sustained
for much of the 70s by the availability of petrodollars enabling
developing countries to borrow large amounts of money, some of which
they used to purchase grain to feed their citizens.
The second factor in the 70s plateau shift was a period of high
inflation and high interest rates that drove up the cost of farm
production. Among the price increases was the price of fuel brought
about by OPEC’s efforts to increase the price of oil.
The higher prices were locked-in in 1977 when the loan rate was
raised to $2.00 from the $1.05 to $1.10 level in effect from 1965
to 1975. The higher loan rates set a floor under commodity prices
that prevented them from plummeting in the early 1980s when the
export-fueled price boom collapsed.
Comparing the current price boom to that of the 1970s, both periods
saw a general price increase across a range of commodities. Fuel
prices increased in both periods driving up the cost of production.
Both periods also experienced a dramatic increase in demand that
was expected to continue unabated.
So far the current price increase has not been accompanied by a
high inflation rate. Given current Federal Reserve policies it seems
unlikely that they will allow inflation to get out of hand.
It also seems highly improbable that the current Congress will double
loan rates. Loan rate levels are now irrelevant anyway since continuation
of the Loan Deficiency Payment program is almost a sure bet. Meaning,
of course, that loan rates would continue to be incapable of putting
a floor under prices, whether they are raised, lowered or left unchanged.
Do the current prices represent a “new plateau” or just
a temporary peak that will be followed by a downhill return to the
level we have seen for the last three decades? We are not prepared
to provide a definitive answer to that question. As we see it, the
jury is still out.
Part of the answer will depend upon answers to a number of other
questions.
Question number one: How quickly will we see a break-through in
the cellulosic production of ethanol that displaces large amounts
of corn as the primary ethanol feedstock?
The second question: Will crude oil prices stay at the same level
or increase for the foreseeable future, or will they fall?
The third question: How quickly can the ethanol industry solve the
current logistic problems that make it difficult to get ethanol
from the Grain-Belt plants to distant seaboard markets?
The fourth question: To what extent will farmers in countries like
Brazil and Argentina respond to the current high prices?
Question number five: Will developing countries like China choose
to feed their growing middle class with imported foodstuffs or will
they choose to produce it themselves?
Question number six: Do the current world-wide-weather-based crop
yield problems we have seen this year represent a pattern that will
be common over the next decade or two?
We want to see the answer to these questions before we are ready
to declare that we have entered upon a new plateau in crop prices.
Daryll E. Ray holds the Blasingame
Chair of Excellence in Agricultural Policy, Institute of Agriculture,
University of Tennessee, and is the Director of UT’s Agricultural
Policy Analysis Center (APAC). (865) 974-7407; Fax: (865) 974-7298;
dray@utk.edu; http://www.agpolicy.org.
Daryll Ray’s column is written with the research and assistance
of Harwood D. Schaffer, Research Associate with APAC.
Reproduction
Permission Granted with:
1) Full attribution to Daryll E. Ray and the Agricultural Policy
Analysis Center, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN;
2) An email sent to hdschaffer@utk.edu
indicating how often you intend on running Dr. Ray’s column
and your total circulation. Also, please send one copy of the first
issue with Dr. Ray’s column in it to Harwood Schaffer, Agricultural
Policy Analysis Center, 309 Morgan Hall, Knoxville, TN 37996-4519.
|